The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God Essay example -- Th

The cosmologic credit line attempts to prove that God exists by showing that there cannot be an infinite number of regressions of campaigns to things that exist. It states that there essentialiness be a final uncaused-cause of all things. This uncaused-cause is asserted to be God. airs the likes of this are prospect up to recognize why we and the universe exist. The Cosmological Argument takes several forms but is basically represented below. Cosmological Argument Things exist It is possible for those things not to exist Whatever has the possibility of non-existence, nonetheless exists, has been caused to exist. Something cannot bring itself into existence because it would throw away had to exist to do that. There cannot be an infinite number of causes to bring nearlything into existence, because an infinite regression of causes has no legitimate cause, which means there is no cause of existence. Since the universe exists, it must( prenominal) have a cause, therefore there must be an uncaused cause of all things. This uncaused cause must be God. Thomas doubting Thomas (1224-1274) had a version of the Cosmological Argument called the Argument from Motion. He say that things in motion could not have brought themselves into motion but must be caused to move. There cannot be an infinite regression of movers. Therefore, there must be an Unmoved Mover. This Unmoved Mover is God. Strengths of the railway line The strengths of the Cosmological Argument consist of the simplicity and easily understandable concept that there cannot be an infinite number of causes to an event. Some arguments for Gods existence bring more thought and education in terms and concep... ...existence of things that are necessary does not quest explanation their non-existence is impossible. The existence of anything dependent upon(p), however, does require explanation. They might not have existed, and so there must be some reason that they do exist. The barely adequate explanation of the existence of the contingent universe, the argument from contingency suggests, is that there exists a necessary being on which its existence it rests. For the existence of the contingent universe must rest on something, and if it rested on some contingent being then that contingent being too would require some explanation of its existence. The ultimate explanation of the existence of all things, therefore, must be the existence of some necessary being. Followers of the cosmological argument identify God as this necessary being.