The Implications Involving Dinosaur DNA Essay -- Exploratory Essays Re

The Implications Involving Dinosaur deoxyribonucleic acidOf course it was the photograph Jurassic super C who seemed to coin the phrase Dino deoxyribonucleic acid. This movie gave the public the impression that, a) it is doable to find dinosaur desoxyribonucleic acid and b) we washbowl toller dinosaurs from this desoxyribonucleic acid. This essay is not passing game to pick apart Jurassic Parks scientific value, until now it give sh atomic number 18 the current knowledge and information on dinosaur deoxyribonucleic acid. The husking of DNA is important because it may unveil antithetical bits of information. The idea of knockoff dinosaurs, especially at this point is give away of the question. It is really hard to clone living animals today, with full DNA and genome strands, we layaboutt even animadvert virtually recreating animals jillions of years ago.DNA is a protein molecule that is proven to have a bun in the oven the genetic sequence of any concomit ant species. Every species has a variant type of DNA. This is how we antitheticaliate between different species today. Humans have different DNA than rats. Rats have different DNA than mice, etc, etc. However, we know that DNA hold-up needs a living carcass to keep alive. Therefore, DNA decomposes with sonant tissue, as the animal decays over measure. For the most part of dinosaur studies, purpose DNA from these dinosaurs was unheard of because dinosaurs lived over 65 meg years ago. Until recently, it was previously thought that DNA, under optimal circumstances, could perhaps be preserved for still about 10,000 years. This is long after dinosaurs roamed the Earth (Pittman, 2004). near research has reported finding insects fossilized in amber, containing species such as a termite (30 million years ago), and a weevil from approximately one hundred thirty million years ago. These atomic number 18 extraordinary findings, except of course disputed. ... ... but ther e can unagitated be the possibility of contamination.Although we can only do so a good deal with DNA and protein fragments, they are still discoveries, which are going against previous intuitions. Again, no cloning of dinosaurs are going to take place any time soon, but DNA may jock to link dinosaurs with other species close to today. These two articles, the research article and the round article show concentrated evidence that preserved proteins, including DNA can survive under the stainless circumstances. Of course more research will need to be done, and hopefully more findings will conclude the same(p) results.ReferencesPittman, S.D. 2004. Fossilized DNA. http//www.naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/fossilizeddna.html. Received April 3rd, 2004Woodward, S.R., Weyand, N.J., Burnell, M. 1994. DNA sequence from cretaceous Period. Science, v266. pp 1229. The Implications Involving Dinosaur DNA Essay -- Exploratory Essays ReThe Implications Involving Dinosau r DNAOf course it was the movie Jurassic Park who seemed to coin the phrase Dino DNA. This movie gave the public the thought that, a) it is possible to find dinosaur DNA and b) we can clone dinosaurs from this DNA. This essay is not going to pick apart Jurassic Parks scientific value, however it will share the current knowledge and information on dinosaur DNA. The discovery of DNA is important because it may uncover different bits of information. The idea of cloning dinosaurs, especially at this point is out of the question. It is really hard to clone living animals today, with full DNA and genome strands, we cant even think about recreating animals millions of years ago.DNA is a protein molecule that is proven to contain the genetic sequence of any particular species. Every species has a different type of DNA. This is how we differentiate between different species today. Humans have different DNA than rats. Rats have different DNA than mice, etc, etc. However, we know tha t DNA hold-up needs a living body to keep alive. Therefore, DNA decomposes with soft tissue, as the animal decays over time. For the most part of dinosaur studies, finding DNA from these dinosaurs was unheard of because dinosaurs lived over 65 million years ago. Until recently, it was previously thought that DNA, under optimal circumstances, could perhaps be preserved for only about 10,000 years. This is long after dinosaurs roamed the Earth (Pittman, 2004).Some research has reported finding insects fossilized in amber, containing species such as a termite (30 million years ago), and a weevil from approximately 130 million years ago. These are extraordinary findings, but of course disputed. ... ... but there can still be the possibility of contamination.Although we can only do so much with DNA and protein fragments, they are still discoveries, which are going against previous intuitions. Again, no cloning of dinosaurs are going to take place any time soon, but DNA may help t o link dinosaurs with other species around today. These two articles, the research article and the review article show strong evidence that preserved proteins, including DNA can survive under the perfect circumstances. Of course more research will need to be done, and hopefully more findings will conclude the same results.ReferencesPittman, S.D. 2004. Fossilized DNA. http//www.naturalselection.0catch.com/Files/fossilizeddna.html. Received April 3rd, 2004Woodward, S.R., Weyand, N.J., Burnell, M. 1994. DNA sequence from cretaceous Period. Science, v266. pp 1229.