Compare the ways in which Larkin and Abse write about love Essay

Comp atomic number 18 the slipway in which Larkin and Abse write most Love, in your response you should write or so at least two of Larkins poems Larkins general sop up on issue and sum is that both ar a liability. This is seen throughout many poems including Selfs the man where Larkin talks about a man being held back and piece of worked to death by his wife. Abses views atomic number 18 somewhat contrary to Larkins. He has a much softer approach when lecture about love and feels that it connects himself with his family, as seen in his poems Postcard to his wife and The Malham darn where he expresses his love for his wife. Love as a theme is beat in many of Larkins poems and Selfs the man illustrates his sterile outlook on pairing and love. In the showtime stanza Larkin directly compares himself to his do up character of Arnold, who represents all the lower class men in a married couple. The outset two lines Oh, no one give the axe defy/ That Arnold is less inco nsiderate than I devour a humorous bank none in with the use of a rhyming duettet, Larkin is patronising the reader. In the following line he writes how Arnold married a woman to stop her get away. In comparison, the poem The Malham Bird Abse writes of love in a different way in love, you a Gentile. His soft smelling creates a slower pace to the poem which shows his love for his late wife.On the former(a) hand Larkin doesnt use the word love and he uses a faster matter-of-fact tone. Larkin is often viewed as sexist just now here he could be seen as saying that women dont get a chance to live their lives how they want to because men bind them Now shes there all day. In the mo stanza Larkin continues to paint women in a poor light And the money he gets for wasting his life on work/ She takes as her perk. The first line uses enjambment which makes the poem sound like a disputation of moans. She appears to be greedy by taking his money. Larkin displays an air of snobbery about the lower classes hard labour jobs. He describes the woman as officious and domineering. Larkin indeed uses colloquial language to make fun of the lower classes and how they talk To pay for the kiddies clobber and the drier/ and the electric fire. He does not rate family life very highly. Larkin states that the roles have reversed in the ternion stanza. Arnold told his wife to marry him and she did and now she is telling him to work, to do the chores etc Planning to have a read at the evening paper/ Its stick a screw in this wall-. The fourth stanza uses colloquial language over again and the fifth and uses a sarcastic and patronising tone.Larkin does not look uponmarriage favourably. Moving into the sixth stanza, the poet claims that Arnold, too, was just out for his avow ends and if it was such a mistake / He still did it for his own sake / Playing his own game. He concludes that he and I are the same and both are selfish, notwithstanding he is better At knowing what I ca n stand / Without them sending a van. The van is a psychic institutes mode of transportation, suggesting that Arnold is dismission mad in his situation. a good deal of this poem is unsympathetic towards Arnolds situation. However at the end Larkin reveals an uncertainty. unawares the poet is faced with the reality of his own situation But wait, not do fast/ Is there such a tell apart? Has he completed the loneliness in his own life because he was too selfish to share. Another poem which presents love as a theme is public lecture in Bed. In this poem Larkin describes a bracing in a failing relationship because they are isolated and mystify it troublesome to communicate. Themarital bed is used as a symbol for marriage a haven for spouses to come in concert. The bed should be the place where a couple feel united, but in this poem, the bed makes the couples climb-down from one another glaringly obvious.The word lying has an ambiguous meaning in this poem on one hand it mean s that the couple in assuming a horizontal position together, and on the other hand, it appears there is some fabrication among them. Goes back so outlying(prenominal) also presents some ambiguity first, the couple have been lying together in their bed for years which is an indication of a lengthy marriage and second, they have been living a lie for many years. The couple are getly unhappy with their marriage. This was a time when separation and divorce was frowned upon but couples stayed together unhappily because it was the right thing to do. There was a brain of accountability within the marriage contract and it was difficult for women in fussy to walk away from their husbands. The second stanza describes the turmoil of their marriage metaphorically by using nature. The awful silence is deafening and an indication of the tense, nervous air travel between the two, worsening as they continue to remain silent. The outside is a reflection of the couple inside the tension height ens between them, and is never relieved. The star is turbulent, scattering the clouds across the sky. Builds and disperses could be a metaphor for an argument the purlieu is fraught and situations cannot be resolved. Clouds have both a dark and sound aspect, and can be difficult tosee through.Metaphorically speaking, a clear sky would represent a marriage at peace, but in this case the clouds suggest a marriage at war with itself these wars could potentially harm the marriage, so the clouds hide them, if you cant see something then it doesnt exist. Dark towns can be used to describe a number of different things faults, disagreements, difficulties, isolation and pain. The contrast of their marriage to the tumultuous winds are a stark reminder of what their future holds. They have to try and work things out to arrive at an amicable solution. It is not understood why their marriage has failed why at this unique distance (lying side-by-side) that they feel so isolated from each other . The husband cannot understand why communication between him and his wife have broken down. Words are not forthcoming and he is at a loss as to how the marriage appears to be irretrievable. Was he ever really in love with his wife? Did he ever feel a softness towards her? It becomes more difficult to find/ Words at once true and kind. He wonders if their marriage was based on a lie or was it inevitably going to fail. Dannie Abses approach to love is different in comparison to Larkin Abse sees love as something to be treasured between him and his family. Where Larkin views love with a hang of cynicism, Abses poems demonstrate a purity and an equality.In The Malham Bird it did not matter that the couple are from different backgrounds you a Gentile and I a Jew Their relationship may have been unacceptable for the times but their love was all that mattered. The poem is littered with fond memories of when the couple first met Dear wife, remember our first illicit/holiday, the rented ro om, the hidden beach. Theirs was a romantic love. Abses couple are happy in contrast to the couples portrayed by Larkin in the above poems. Their shared history is wide of warmth and mutual admiration. Where Larkins poems view love as a hindrance and something a man can do without, Abse firmly believes you film love above all else. In Postcard to his Wife, Abses picture is of a husband (himself) desperately missing his wife in her absence. He longs for them to spend the day together. He wishes she would Make excuses so that she would be internal with him. He loves her and enjoys her presence the opposite of Larkins idea of relationships. Abse feels there is a void in his life when his wife is not around and cannot obligate the heartache. The contrast between Larkin and Abses views on love and relationships are diametrical opposites.