Art History Final

Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol , though separated by or so 50 years and different cultures , produced nontextual matter that spoke essentially around the same problems . Their art can be comp ard in triple layers : a surface gaze , a close to deeper spirit , and , finally a thorough examinationAt a glance , Duchamp and Warhol urinate a lot in common . two lived hammy , public lives . They were scandalous artists , who challenged the very notion of art with their give way . Both of them used common objects in their art , and contextualized them to hold them into sprains of art Warhol s silk prints encounterm a very true(a) continuation of Duchamp s ready- take on , and his piss-paintings attend a spell on Duchamp s fountain . These similarities are great enough for some community to unwittingly confuse Duchamp and Warhol , judging them most a kindred from the hosts of neo and Postmodern artistsBut those few points adverted above are where their commonality ends When taking a closer play , we and so suddenly see , that they are wildly different in animationstyle , which leads to differences in flex style , which the untrained eye misses well . Duchamp took up art for the sake of art , and neer had to do craft hightail it for a living , while most of Warhol s early work and some of his later work is explicitly commercial . Duchamp neer do a replica of his own work : he took particular anxiety to have each of them be ridiculous . Warhol would make copies by the hundreds and then , shaming would become cardinal of the markers of his work . plain when copying works of others , Duchamp would take the trouble to increase his touch to them - like the mustache on the Mona Lisa copy .

Warhol , all the same when making unique compositions , would turn them into crafts by applying them practically , like making the cover for John Lennon s CD Menlove Ave Duchamp was never a comp all man : after his commencement exercise bad beauty salon experience he would never conform to any elegant group , and he considered the brotherly position of art to be a detriment to it . Warhol continuously had people around , point though he was purported to be quiet and laconic , he took part in legion(predicate) social events until the end of his life , and nearly died because of the overzealousness of one of his fans . Even when after this incident , he stopped collective work , later he would be an inspiration for a solid new generation of artists . Duch amp cared for little outside of art , and when he stopped affectionateness about art , he started caring about chess . Warhol made a name for himself in too many media to list . Duchamp was concerned with things , with their reality , and was a great fan of physical science and scientific discoveries . Warhol s favourite(a) subject was simple - nothing . With such great differences , is it any wonder that , at a sustain look , they seem like having similar methods dictated to them by circumstance , save completely different in themeYet , when we look a tierce time , and see that the two were indeed concerned...If you want to turn a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper