British Prime Minister

From the year 1905 to the year 2008, t here(predicate) be already 24 prime subgenus Pastors who have ruled over as the native attend of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom prime(a) curates 2008). As of the manifest times, the property is occupied by Gordon Brown. The military congregation that is being held by the prime parson of religion has been passed on from one hand over the next for the past 103 years. The tooth root of role is an important factor in analyzing the role of the prime minister and the way through which a deeper understanding of how it is maintained gage be seen.The distinctiveness and the constant replacement of the prime minister over the run away of their existence in the British regularisement have to be related to the dynamics of originator in concert with its writer in prep ar to justify why and how it is held by the heap in vex. This paper aims to draw a concept of military unit and identify whether thither is an informal and formal fac e of index. This is done through a research using different literatures and as well draws upon psycheal opinion in order to provide a unfavorable position on the general topic of place.This is followed by a password of the violence that is exercised by the prime minister, more special(prenominal)ally that of the United Kingdom. The sources of power, tally to the conventions, arrangements, and radical devices ar also researched in order to relate this to how the power is earned and maintained. In order to do this, the experiences of the past prime ministers argon studied and collected to form a historical overview of how the power to govern as a prime minister is taken and maintained. What is Power?In understanding the concept of power, it is important to take none of its translation and the characteristics that ar associated with it. Morgan (2006) defines it to be the medium through which conflicts of interest be ultimately heady and crooks who gets what, when, an d how (p. 166). In relation to this, it is seen that power occurs with the picture of social reality gaunt by the members of a particular group and the need for the allocation of the scarce resources (Pfeffer & Salancik 2003). in that location is a relation that fundament be seen from the deuce definitions wherein it could be derived that the person or the group which has the power defines the resources that are considered to be of limit amount. Along with the possession of power is the business leader and function for particular resources together with its allocation. In appurtenance to this, the seat of power is defined by the psyches do up a group. Politically speaking, power is seen to be a meaning through which sharing occurs in the process of making decisions (Fahlbusch, Bromily, & Barrett 1999).In the mount of the government, the decision-making process meanaaas the formulation of the policies, which take government exertion mechanism or inaction. make headway disparity is seen with the use of power as there are two faces seen for it. It is seen as an instrument through which peace and status quo potful be achieved (Fahlbusch, Bromily, & Barrett 1999). On the some opposite hand, it remains to be very sensitized to abuse that includes misuse, excess, and tyranny (Fahlbusch, Bromily, & Barrett 1999 311)Two additional and related definitions of power is provided by Shortell and Kaluzny (1997) where it is seen that power is 1) something that is used in order to permute the course of action or behavior of another group or single and 2) the influence that is exerted in order to force another person or group to do something that is in opposite to the original decision. thither are genuine elements that brush off be clearly seen from these definitions of power. First, it is seen that it whitethorn or it may not transcend through a hierarchical structure and is not aquiline on the way through which positions in the organiza tion is patterned.This is because the direction from which the power stems can be anywhere who can actually accomplish the two conditions mentioned above. However, it can be seen that there is, actually, a greater materialize for those who pack soaringer positions to have power and use it because of the capabilities and responsibilities that is attached to the position. Second, it is a gist of initiating exchange. To a certain extent, it can be seen that change is often associated with lead as the latter is associated with two characteristics which include being masters of change and visionaries (Fisher 1999 138).It can be related that since there is a sense of change in every leader, it can be seen that power is something that is used for the economic consumption of leading people into making some(prenominal) changes for a particular aspiration that is intended. It should be noted, console, that leadership is not the same as management and may or may not lie within the fo rmal organizational structure. Third, power is sometimes associated with coercion and the use of force in order to achieve something.Though this is oftentimes seen and accepted in negative terms, it should be considered that this is not the sole aspect of power. In fact, there are different types of power that is classified according to their sources and coercion is only one of the elements that can be seen from one or a few of these types. A discussion with ask to this is placed in the following section. Sources of Power There are quintette general sources of power as presented by Cronkhite (2008). The classification includes reward power, unequivocal power, legitimate power, referent power, and good power (Cronkhite 2008).First, reward power exists where truth and cooperation is earned in exchange for something that is needed (Cronkhite 2008). Second, coercive power involves the ability to take away something that is considered to be of value when the behavior or action desi red is not achieved (R. Denhardt, J. Denhardt, & Aristigueta 2001). Third, legitimate power, placed in simple(a) terms, is considered to be the type of power which stems from the position that is being held wherein people are made to follow and act in consideration of the organizational structure, which indicates the position (Bob, I.Asherman, S. Asherman, & Randall 2001). Fourth, referent power is the type wherein power is gained through joining with a powerful group or persons (Timby & Smith 2007). It could be of the inherent power of the organization to which a particular person belongs that makes other people behave in a particular manner Lastly, expert power is that which is derived from the special knowledge, skill, or ability that a particular individual possesses (Cottam, Uhler, Mastors, & Preston 2004).The Role of the height subgenus Pastor There are several roles that need to be fulfilled by the British ground diplomatic minister being the national leader. The breadth of responsibilities include constitutional and procedural, appointments to ministerial and other senior posts, conduct of Cabinet and parliamentary business, the organization and efficiency of government, the figure and other economic decisions, and special foreign and defense functions (Mayne 1999 26).As can be discerned from the list of general roles taken by the primitive Minister, there are functions which are legislative and executive in nature. The top Ministers presence and determine is felt when it comes to form _or_ system of government formulation, which is in the decision-making process, and in policy implementation, which is the executive functions of the prime minister. For example, he or she has affairs to deal with in the decisions made scarce also has defense functions, which is under the executive process of the government.Another set of classification is also provided by Borthwick, Shell, and Williams (1995) wherein the Prime Minister is vested with responsibilities as the primary individual responsible for the operations of the government, the head of the fellowship to which he or she belongs, and the leader of the whole nation. There are different specific tasks that need to be accomplished in consideration of the different interests of the people to whom the prime minister is accountable to.It is also defined by Hayward and Menon (2003) that a seemingly prime ministerial government exists in Britain wherein the prime minister co-ordinates policy, resolves conflicts, and controls the main resources (67). In the definition previously provided in an attempt to straighten out the concept of power, it has been shown that the elements of power include possession of control in resources, an influence in the decision making process, and a voice in the stoppage of conflict.These are the three elements that could also be discerned from the functions and roles of the prime minister that are presented by Hayward and Menon (2003) and Mayne (1999). It can be concluded that the set of functions disposed here characterize the existence of power within the hands of the Prime Minister and the sources can be both formal and informal, as is followed in the definition of power in general. Where it all Comes From There are different sources of power that can be seen from the history of prime ministerial incumbency in Britain.Through the intricate network of relations formed from the organizational hierarchy of the government, it can be seen that there are three general sources of power that includes the conventions, the constitutional devices, and the arrangements that are present in the British government. From personal characteristics also comes a consideration of whether or not a particular individual is given the power to serve as the Prime Minister.There are four characteristics, which include 1) the name and status in the society or an organization together with what an individual can do 2) perceived link wi th success in terms of politics 3) acceptance of the public and 4) a relatively high position in the party, parliamentary party, and government (Poguntke & Webb 2005 37). While these can not be considered as the direct sources of power, it serves as among the characteristics that are seen as bases whether power is given to an individual or not.This is important because these are requirements or prerequisites that are seen to be the main characteristics of the people that are vested with the powers of the Prime Minister. Likewise, it can be seen that these bases for the acquisition of power is not framed in the genius nor is it determined through the formal lines of government but are the nates elements being considered in the natural selection process. However, it should also be noted that not everyone who fits these conditions become Prime Ministers.This is because there are other forms of standards are present that limits only one individual to be considered reformful as th e Prime Minister. To a certain extent, it can be utter that the Prime Minister is considered to be an elected monarch butterfly and draws certain powers from the Royal Crown of the domain of a function (Borthwick, Shell, & Williams 1995). The approval and acceptance of the monarch has been an important factor in maintaining the power that is within the reach of the Prime Minister.Over the years, the manner through which the monarch is selected has evolved in such a way that in the beginning, it is the personal affiliation of the person to the monarch that mattered but in the twentieth century, it became the credentials and nicety of the person that is considered by the monarch (Borthwick, Shell, & Williams 1995). While todays monarch do not hold as much power and influence as those that existed in the past, they are still given the chance to voice out their concerns over the affairs of the government especially with the selection of the key leaders of the country.It has be en through traditional considerations and the influence that the monarch has that renders them to still be powerful for certain decisions made in the country. In addition to this, the Prime Minister is tasked to report to the monarch every week in consideration of the monarchs possession of the right to be consulted, the right to encourage and the right to warn (Williams 1998 165). There are still powers and rights that are given to the monarch that the Prime Minister could not ignore and should continuously take into account for the former could easily use its power against the Prime Minister.In addition to this, it is argued by Harrison and Boyd (2006) that the major development strengthening PM power over the last century have been mainly political quite an than constitutional (34-5). Politically speaking, the power of the Prime Minister is related to the party that wins in the support of Common, which is considered to be a source of power for the Prime Minister (Borthwick, Sh ell, & Williams 1995). The largest party wins in the House of Common and the person who serves as the leader of the said party is appointed as the Prime Minister with the approval of respective authorities in the land.Just the same as the Prime Minister reports to the monarch, he or she is likewise responsible to the House in lieu of the need to maintain the power that is vested upon him or her. There are several expectations that need to be fulfilled as a Prime Minister that would continuously be within the shoulders of the incumbent. Moreover, another source of power for the Prime Minister is the assignment of being the First noble of the Treasury where the two positions are often associated with one another (Goodnow 2005). The responsibilities of the said office give the Prime Minister another area from where his or her power could stem from.Conclusion Power is considered to be the influence in the decision-making process, the control over the resources, and the force exerted over the behavior and actions of other people. In general, there are five sources of power that is categorized according to how power is deliver the goods and maintained. Placed in the context of the British government, power is considered in the roles of the Prime Minister. There are general roles that are fulfilled by the individual who is incumbent to the said position, which is being the head of the state, government, and the parliament.The powers of the Prime Minister are also earned through the monarch and the positions assigned of him or her. There are different limitations to the extent of control exhibited by the monarchy today but it remains to be ingrained in the British society and it can still place several pressures on the Prime Minister and the power of the same. In addition to this, there are also personal characteristics that are held as important for the position. Indeed, the powers of the Prime Minister stem from different sources, which are both formal and info rmal.The broad range from which power is sourced out is considered to be an implication of the need for a clear delineation of the powers and functions of the British Prime Minister. List of References Bob, P. , Asherman, I. , Aherman, S. , and Randall, J. (2001) The Negotiation Sourcebook. Amherst, MA HRD Press. Borthwick, R. L. , Shell, D. , and Williams, R. (1995) Churchill to Major The British Prime Ministership Since 1945. NY M. E. Sharpe, Inc. Cottam, M. , Uhler, B. , Mastors, E. and Preston, T. (2004) entree to Political Psychology.Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Cronkhite, C. (2008) Criminal Justice Administration Strategies for the 21st Century. Sudbury, MA Jones and Bartlett Publishers. Denhardt, R. , Denhardt, J. and Aristigueta, M. (2001) Managing Human Behavior in Public and Nonprofit Organizations. capital of the United Kingdom SAGE. Fahlbusch, E. , Bromiley, G. , and Barrett, D. (1999) The Encyclopedia of Christianity (A-D). Michigan Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ ishing Company. Fisher, K. (1999) Leading Self-Directed Work Teams A Guide to Developing New Team Leadership Skills. NY McGraw-Hill. Goodnow, F.(2005) relative administrative Law An abbreviation of The Administrative Systems, National And Local, Of The United States, England, France, And Germany. NY G. P. Putnams Sons. Harrison, K. and Boyd, T. (2006) The ever-changing Constitution. Edinburgh Edinburgh University Press. Hayward, J. and Menon, A. (2003) Governing Europe. Oxford Oxford University Press. Mayne, A. (1999) From Politics Past to Politics Future An Integrated Analysis of Current and Emergent Paradigms. Westport, CT Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. Morgan, G. (2006) Images of Organization. London SAGE. Pfeffer, J.and Salancik, G. (2003) The External cover of Organizations A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CA Stanford University Press. Poguntke, T. and Webb, P. (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford Oxford U niversity Press. Shortell, S. and Kaluzny, A. (1997) Essentials of Health Care Management. NY Thomson Delmar. Timby, B. & Smith, N. (2007) Introductory Medical-Surgical Nursing. Philadelphia PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Williams, A. (1998) UK Government and Politics. Oxford Heinemann Educational Publishers.